Salesforce

The "proutil bigrow"command performs differently between 2 different disks types

« Go Back

Information

 
TitleThe "proutil bigrow"command performs differently between 2 different disks types
URL NameThe-proutil-bigrow-command-performs-differently-between-2-different-disks-types
Article Number000177926
EnvironmentProduct: OpenEdge
Version: All supported versions
OS: Linux
Question/Problem Description
The "proutil bigrow"command performs differently between 2 different disks types. It takes longer on the Intel card. Is this expected?
A probkup, prorest and even dbanalys takes the same amount of time, regardless of the drive used.

 
Steps to Reproduce
Clarifying Information
Virtual machine environment. 
Error Message
Defect Number
Enhancement Number
Cause
Resolution
The difference between bigrow and the other tools is that bigrow is pre-allocating and re-formatting disk space specified by the command. If there is a difference in performance between disks, it is because one disk has a better I/O then the other. A test outside of Progress can be performed to eliminate Progress involvement. 

For example, if specifying 8 in the bigrow command and the BI cluster size is 16Mb, that means the BI file is being pre-formatted to (8+4) * 16Mb = 192Mb. The 4 represents the default BI clusters. On unix/linux run the dd command to simulate what bigrow does:

/usr/bin/time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test.out bs=<bi block size> count=<value> oflag=dsync

The BI block size can be acquired from the output of the command "proutil <dbname> -C describe"
For the example above, the count should be a number that multiplied by the BI block size will get a file that is 192Mb in size, for example if the BI block size is 8k then the command should be :

/usr/bin/time dd if=/dev/zero of=./test.out bs=8k count=24550 oflag=dsync
Workaround
Notes
Keyword Phrase
Last Modified Date12/13/2018 5:09 PM

Powered by